Tagged with change

A Tale of Sheep and Monks – Why Even “Sustainable” Capitalism is Not The Answer

Key Question in this Post:

  • Is a revolution in capitalism the key to saving us from doom?
  • Are sustainable companies the key to saving us?
  • Will “zero / negative economic growth” be the answer?

I guess it started as a thought only in Weekly Ponder #4 when I considered one emerging school of thought in sustainability that argues whether the model of perpetual economic growth is (1) viable or (2) even desirable. The assumption was that resource depletion for some time now has already reached a point where it exceeds the rate by which we can restore those resources. Underlying this was an idea that questioned whether we may even need to consider zero to negative economic growth in developed countries to slow that rate of resource depletion – while still not losing that much in the quality of life.

Perhaps because part of me feels the idea of non-growth is semi-reasonable just at the same time that it’s also crazy and heretical, I’ve been wondering how much we are really achieving with the prevailing mode of sustainability of today. As I come across hundreds of blogs, tweets and Facebook comments every week on the web, I feel increasingly uneasy and -for a long time already – quite unsatisfied with the headlines about this or that corporate CSR/sustainability achievement here and there. As some of you may remember my past skepticism about sustainability as we know it, I’ve always considered the majority of corporate sustainability efforts, while well meaning, not much more than “doing less bad” than actually doing real good. Combine this with the last ponder about growth and I am encouraged in my doubt, which I restate commonly as follows: there is simply no way we can have our cake and eat it.

In  other words, I fear we can’t keep capitalism – even the sustainability-prone type – the way it is. Not if we care about esoteric, hippy stuff like survival, that is. But what I will argue today – and indeed what I fear far more – is this: even “super-duper sustainable, radically modified, shared/blended/mixed/hybrid value” capitalism won’t do it for us… not by a long shot.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Dilemma of Sustainability – Should Entrepreneurship be our Natural Right?

Key Question in this Post:

  • Does the right to economic pursuit through entrepreneurship outweigh the duty of environmental stewardship?

In a previous post, I contemplated whether sustainability careers were actually “do good” or mostly “do less bad” careers. I argued for the latter and made an assumption that most companies, unless they can reverse the environmental degradation they cause, or at least come out neutral, ultimately cannot call themselves as entities that do good, but merely “more or less sustainable” than their competitors. This line of reasoning mostly addressed existing companies and their impact on the environment. It thus particularly mattered to those contemplating joining up-and-running companies and how to keep tabs on their sustainability practices.

Today, I would like to draw attention to the impact of companies that were just born today and yesterday. In other words, what is the responsibility and net effect of entrepreneurs in this whole discussion on sustainability? In our rabid attack on the boo-boos of familiar big brands around the world, some of whom are working hard at doing less bad, how many of us stop to think about the cumulative impact that companies started around the world every day have in the big picture? Hence, for all you aspiring sustainable entrepreneurs, have you ever thought about how much of your hard, hard sustainably defensible work is undone every day by your even more zealous, mostly financially driven counterparts in the developing world, many of whom doing so without paying too much attention to their environmental impact?

The question I am trying to raise is this: where does their right to economic development end, and where does your push for adoption of (more expensive) sustainability practices start?

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , ,

Book Review – “Driving Social Change”

Recently read:

Driving Social Change – How to solve the world’s toughest problems (Paul C. Light)

My grade (1 to 5): 3 – informative but not greatly written (mostly 1 notable insight, rest can be flipped through quickly, too many buzzwords)

Key Ideas:

  • Fundamentally argues that if we truly want to effect lasting social change, we are not seeing the full picture if we keep idolizing individual social entrepreneurs without recognizing that they only play one role among many others that contribute to what the author calls social “breakthroughs”
  • Depending on the problem to be solved, social breakthroughs require one or more among 4 key concepts: (1) new ideas (social entrepreneurship), (2) defense and expansion of past breakthroughs (social safekeeping), (3) research, data and trend analysis (social exploring), (4) demand for change in social networks (social advocacy)

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,