Tagged with job

4 Steps to Choosing a “Good Career” (Part 1) – Scaling of Impact

Key Ideas:

  • You are an experienced professional in the middle, or a student at the beginning of your career. For whatever reason, you have decided you now want to “do good” with your career… or “more” good than you previously have, whatever that means. But you don’t quite know in what area and in what capacity. Whether or not you are deeply passionate about a particular issue area, e.g., education, healthcare, energy, human rights, sustainable food, etc., you just know you want to have a (more) meaningful social impact in your area of choice.
  • However, the options can be bewildering. Either they all kind of sound good or, more likely, they all kind of sound the same. Should you go into nonprofit? Join a social enterprise? Try your luck with corporate social innovation aka “CSR”? How about impact investing? How about consulting for sustainability? What’s wrong with just a good old “traditional” for-profit job? The list goes on.
  • If you are the student, you may ask where you should start. If you are the experienced professional considering a change, you will ask how to choose between a host of options before pouring in your remaining heart, time and energy.
  • In this four part post series my goal is to propose a simple, yet hopefully useful approach of evaluating and picking what may be a suitable do-good career option for you. Using it may save you some time and disheartening experiences along the way to becoming and remaining a changemaker throughout your life.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Deferring “Good” Careers (Part 2) – Defining the available job pool

Key Ideas from “Deferring Good Careers (Part 1)” Post (Dec 20, 2011):

  • Philanthropy may be a subject of passion for those who already have made or sit on a good deal of money, but for the rest of us it should not be as relevant because (1) there are not enough of us with a lot of money and time to worry about where to put them to the best use and (2) philanthropy is not a full time job; it in fact detracts from the harder, more important idea we should think about, which is how we can incorporate a significant portion of our “do good” intentions into an attractive, life-long career instead of relegating it to mostly a by-thought or feel-good hobby in our spare time (or retirement)
  • The questions we left with were (1) how should a young person choose between making more money sooner and engaging in “doing good” later, vs. pursuing sooner an occupation that promotes his or her ideals of “doing good” and is meaningful, but potentially sacrificing building wealth in the long term? and (2) how much ought this “doing good” thing be valued both by employees and employers?

In this Part 2, I will now try to set up the conversation by first examining what the actual availability of positions is we are talking about. In Part 3, I will then attempt to qualify the career trade-off at stake and focus on the problem of compensation within this space for available positions.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,